<div class='mailmunch-forms-before-post' style='display: none !important;'></div><h3 style="text-align: center;"><strong>Supreme Court Oral Arguments for Wednesday the 21st, 2018</strong></h3>
<p><strong>16-9493 ROSALES-MIRELES V. </strong>UNITED<strong> STATES </strong></p>
<p>DECISION BELOW: 850 F.3d 246 CERT. GRANTED 9/28/2017</p><script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> 
<ins class="adsbygoogle" 
 style="display:block; text-align:center;" 
 data-ad-layout="in-article" 
 data-ad-format="fluid" 
 data-ad-client="ca-pub-5175198302130341" 
 data-ad-slot="9182933377"></ins> 
<script> 
 (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 
</script>
<p>QUESTION PRESENTED: In United· States v. Olano, this Court held that, under the fourth prong of plain error review, &#8220;[t]he Court of Appeals should correct a plain forfeited error affecting substantial rights if the error ‘seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.&#8221; 507 U.S. 725, 736 (1993). To meet that standard, is it necessary, as the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals required, that the error be one that &#8220;would shock the conscience of the common man, serve as a powerful indictment against our system of Justice, or seriously call into question the competence or integrity of the district judge?&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>17-43 DAHDA V. UNITED STATES </strong></p><div class='mailmunch-forms-in-post-middle' style='display: none !important;'></div>
<p>DECISION BELOW: 853 F.3d 1101 JUSTICE GORSUCH TOOK NO PART. CERT. GRANTED 10/16/2017</p>
<p>QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2520, requires suppression of evidence obtained pursuant to a wiretap order that is facially insufficient because the order exceeds the judge&#8217;s territorial jurisdiction.</p>

<div class="jetpack-simple-payments-1966 jetpack-simple-payments-wrapper">
	<div class="jetpack-simple-payments-product">
		<div class="jetpack-simple-payments-product-image"><div class="jetpack-simple-payments-image"><img width="3257" height="2443" src="https://i0.wp.com/thescotusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IMG_7949.jpg?fit=3257%2C2443&;ssl=1" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/thescotusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IMG_7949.jpg?w=3257&;ssl=1 3257w, https://i0.wp.com/thescotusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IMG_7949.jpg?resize=300%2C225&;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/thescotusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IMG_7949.jpg?resize=768%2C576&;ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/thescotusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IMG_7949.jpg?resize=1024%2C768&;ssl=1 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/thescotusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IMG_7949.jpg?resize=600%2C450&;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/thescotusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IMG_7949.jpg?w=2000&;ssl=1 2000w, https://i0.wp.com/thescotusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/IMG_7949.jpg?w=3000&;ssl=1 3000w" sizes="(max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" /></div></div>
		<div class="jetpack-simple-payments-details">
			<div class="jetpack-simple-payments-title"><p>Help support our efforts by becoming a TheScotusReport.com and @Scotus sponsor</p></div>
			<div class="jetpack-simple-payments-description"><p>TheScotusReport.com and @Scotus has launched a program to help fund our work.

If just a small percentage of our reader’s chip in a few dollars we’ll be able to do more reporting on the latest updates at the Supreme Court.
</p></div>
			<div class="jetpack-simple-payments-price"><p>$3.00</p></div>
			<div class="jetpack-simple-payments-purchase-message" id="jetpack-simple-payments-1966_69fc78a50f4491.09955919-message-container"></div><div class="jetpack-simple-payments-purchase-box">
				<div class="jetpack-simple-payments-items">
					<input class="jetpack-simple-payments-items-number" type="number" value="1" min="1" id="jetpack-simple-payments-1966_69fc78a50f4491.09955919_number" />
				</div>
				<div class="jetpack-simple-payments-button" id="jetpack-simple-payments-1966_69fc78a50f4491.09955919_button"></div></div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>

<p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0674062485/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&;camp=1789&;creative=9325&;creativeASIN=0674062485&;linkCode=as2&;tag=hescotusrepor-20&;linkId=e3d481c9d264567469f64b6ae3f848d7" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img class=" alignleft" src="//ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com/widgets/q?_encoding=UTF8&;MarketPlace=US&;ASIN=0674062485&;ServiceVersion=20070822&;ID=AsinImage&;WS=1&;Format=_SL250_&;tag=hescotusrepor-20" border="0" /></a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="//ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=hescotusrepor-20&;l=am2&;o=1&;a=0674062485" alt="" width="1" height="1" border="0" /><br />
Get your addition of Thinking like a Lawyer today! This book is a valuable aid to anyone interested in rules, precedent and legal reasoning. The book would be a great tool for any student of law or legal scholar.</p>
<div class='mailmunch-forms-after-post' style='display: none !important;'></div></p><p class="wpsai_spacing_before_adsense"></p> 

On Today’s Docket @ The Supreme Court
