<div class='mailmunch-forms-before-post' style='display: none !important;'></div><h3>On Monday the U.S. Supreme Court responded to an urgent request from the Justice Department. The request was to keep the &#8220;Trump Travel Ban&#8221; in place. This past June a decision was made that allowed for a limited ban blocking citizens of six countries from entering the United States. The Court ruled that a limited ban could legally go into effect on these nations except for those with &#8220;bona fide&#8221; connections with the United States.</h3>
<h3>One of the reasons for the urgent Justice Department request was due to a Circuit Court ruling that would revoke the ban.</h3>
<h3>Another factor for the Justic<img class=" wp-image-1043 alignright" style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: 400;" src="https://thescotusreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/supreme-court-544218_1280.jpg" alt="supreme-court-544218_1280.jpg" width="418" height="334" />e Department&#8217;s last move is due to a limited time frame that was given for the ban which was to be 90 days. The Justice Department asked to keep the ban in place until a hearing can be held that would make the ban permanent.</h3>
<h3>A hearing to debate the legality of the ban is scheduled for</h3>
<h3>the Supreme Court later this fall.</h3>
</p><div class='mailmunch-forms-in-post-middle' style='display: none !important;'></div><div class='mailmunch-forms-after-post' style='display: none !important;'></div></p><script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> 
<ins class="adsbygoogle" 
 style="display:block; text-align:center;" 
 data-ad-layout="in-article" 
 data-ad-format="fluid" 
 data-ad-client="ca-pub-5175198302130341" 
 data-ad-slot="9182933377"></ins> 
<script> 
 (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 
</script><p class="wpsai_spacing_before_adsense"></p> 

Supreme’s support Travel Ban
