<div class='mailmunch-forms-before-post' style='display: none !important;'></div><p>On the Docket Tuesday, October 9th.</p>
<section class="abstract ng-scope">
<div class="ng-binding">
<p>A former specialist for the Chicago, Housing Services, filed suit against her former employers, for alleged violations of age discrimination.</p><script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script> 
<ins class="adsbygoogle" 
 style="display:block; text-align:center;" 
 data-ad-layout="in-article" 
 data-ad-format="fluid" 
 data-ad-client="ca-pub-5175198302130341" 
 data-ad-slot="9182933377"></ins> 
<script> 
 (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 
</script>
<p>Does Federal court of appeals have jurisdiction over this type of appeal.</p><div class='mailmunch-forms-in-post-middle' style='display: none !important;'></div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="abstract ng-scope">
<div class="ng-binding"></div>
</section>
<table id="docketinfo" class="Basic-Table table">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="InfoTitle" colspan="2"><span class="DocketInfoTitle">No. 16-658<br />
</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="200">Title:</td>
<td><span class="title">Charmaine Hamer, Petitioner<br />
v.<br />
Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, et al.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="200">Docketed:</td>
<td>November 17, 2016</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="200">Lower Ct:</td>
<td>United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="200"> Case Numbers:</td>
<td>(15-3764)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="200"> Decision Date:</td>
<td>August 31, 2016</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/DocketFiles/HTML/qp/16-00658qp.pdf">Questions Presented</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div></div>
<table id="proceedings" class="Basic-Table">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="proceedingheader" width="200"><span class="tableTitle">DATE</span></td>
<td class="proceedingheader"><span class="tableTitle">PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="200">Nov 15 2016</td>
<td>Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 19, 2016)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="borderbttm" align="right" width="200"></td>
<td class="borderbttm"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="200">Dec 14 2016</td>
<td>Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 18, 2017, for all respondents.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="borderbttm" align="right" width="200"></td>
<td class="borderbttm"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="200">Jan 18 2017</td>
<td>Brief of respondents Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago &; Fannie Mae in opposition filed.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> ;</p>
<div class='mailmunch-forms-after-post' style='display: none !important;'></div></p><p class="wpsai_spacing_before_adsense"></p> 

The Supreme Court is back to work
